2016 class · 17 prospects

Guard G

Same inputs as tackle, with slightly more emphasis on Senior Bowl + Pro Day testing.

Likeliest career, by the outcome model.

How many guards land in each career bucket as the model's single most likely finish. This is a different question from the board grades below — a prospect can be a Day 3 grade and still have “starter” as his likeliest outcome. The tails (elite, bust) are where the model separates; the middle two buckets sit close to a coin flip.

Elite
0
None in this class — the top is thin
Starter
7
Multi-year NFL starter
Role
10
Rotational / depth
Bust
0
Nobody here busts as his likeliest outcome — individual risk still varies, see the rows below
Likeliest career across the G class
Elite
0
Starter
7
Role
10
Bust
0

The board.

All 17 guards with a draftable grade on Draftanomics's 2016 board, tier by tier.

Blue Chip1 player

The blue-chip shelf is one name deep: Cody Whitehair out of Kansas St., pegged at No. 6 overall. Then the board falls off a cliff — 27 projected picks between Whitehair and Joshua Garnett, the next name down. Cody Whitehair is the argument in this tier — No. 6 on our board against a consensus No. 29.

6
Cody Whitehair
Kansas St.· consensus #29
A blue-chip grade the room hasn't caught up to — consensus No. 29.
Blue Chip
bust risk 3%
1st Round0 players

An empty tier, honestly labeled — no guard earns a first-round grade this cycle.

Day 210 players

The Day 2 tier runs 10 deep, opening with Joshua Garnett out of Stanford at No. 33 and closing with Sebastian Tretola at No. 101. Then the board falls off a cliff — 43 projected picks between Tretola and Parker Ehinger, the next name down. Connor McGovern is the argument in this tier — No. 72 on our board against a consensus No. 133.

33
Joshua Garnett
Stanford· 6'4" · 312 lb· consensus #49
A Day 2 grade the room hasn't caught up to — consensus No. 49.
Day 2
bust risk 17%
46
Germain Ifedi
Texas A&M· consensus #58
A Day 2 grade with the room in agreement — consensus No. 58.
Day 2
bust risk 6%
52
Christian Westerman
Arizona St.· consensus #93
A Day 2 grade the room hasn't caught up to — consensus No. 93.
Day 2
bust risk 6%
66
Isaac Seumalo
Oregon St.· 6'4" · 303 lb· consensus #112
A Day 2 grade the room hasn't caught up to — consensus No. 112.
Day 2
bust risk 3%
72
Connor McGovern
Missouri· 6'4" · 306 lb· consensus #133
A Day 2 grade the room hasn't caught up to — consensus No. 133.
Day 2
bust risk 3%
76
Nick Martin
Notre Dame· consensus #94
A Day 2 grade the room hasn't caught up to — consensus No. 94.
Day 2
bust risk 3%
85
Spencer Drango
Baylor· consensus #130
A Day 2 grade the room hasn't caught up to — consensus No. 130.
Day 2
bust risk 6%
88
Vadal Alexander
LSU· consensus #77
A Day 2 grade with the room in agreement — consensus No. 77.
Day 2
bust risk 10%
98
Joe Thuney
North Carolina St.· consensus #59
A Day 2 grade, though the room is higher on him — consensus No. 59.
Day 2
bust risk 1%
Day 36 players

This is where the class lives: 6 guards carry a Day 3 grade, with Parker Ehinger out of Cincinnati at the front of the line at No. 144 overall. The room is higher on Parker Ehinger than we are: consensus No. 46 to our No. 144.