3 prospects · 2017 draft
The four numbers a GM checks first.
Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.
Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.
Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.
Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.
The model's plain-English read.
Draftanomics projects Garett Bolles as a first-round pick at #23 (range #9-#37, wide band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #23 sits within 6 spots of the room's #29 — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 0% bust probability break ties on draft day.
Draftanomics projects Antonio Garcia as a Day 2 pick at #49 (range #1-#109, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 63% — scary. The comp set leans young — most of his closest comps haven't played enough NFL snaps yet to be confidently graded. Closest comps: Jake Rodgers, Denzelle Good, Andrew Donnal. Ceiling is Brandon Scherff; floor is Denzelle Good. The call is a value lean: #49 against a consensus #76 is a 27-spot edge — enough to move him up the queue, not enough to reach a round early, and the wide band around the 63% bust number says size it modestly.
Draftanomics projects Adam Bisnowaty as a Day 3 dart throw at #206 (range #157-#255, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 43% — real but not disqualifying. The comp set leans young — most of his closest comps haven't played enough NFL snaps yet to be confidently graded. Closest comps: Jamon Brown, Rob Havenstein, Andrew Donnal. Ceiling is Rob Havenstein; floor is Denzelle Good. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #124 and the model won't take him before #206 — a 82-spot markdown. The 82-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.