Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2016 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2016 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (P)
LE
Lac Edwards
P · Sam Houston St.
24.0 yo · — · —
DK
Drew Kaser
P · Texas A&M
23.2 yo · 6'2" · 212 lb
RD
Riley Dixon
P · Syracuse
22.7 yo · 6'4" · 221 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Lac Edwards
Predicted pick
#214
range #193–#235
Bust probability
21%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel
Drew Kaser
Predicted pick
#168
range #158–#178
Bust probability
35%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel
Riley Dixon
Predicted pick
#134
range #120–#148
Bust probability
38%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Lac Edwards· Specialists
  • Drew Kaser· Specialists
  • Riley Dixon· Specialists
Axis leaders
  • ProductionLac Edwards50
  • AthleticismLac Edwards23
  • AgeRiley Dixon68
  • ConsensusRiley Dixon22
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Lac Edwards50
  • Breakout ageLac Edwards50
  • WorkloadLac Edwards50
  • RAS × productionLac Edwards50

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Lac Edwards
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Drew Kaser
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Riley Dixon
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Lac Edwards
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 24.0 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #753; model has him #214 — a 539-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Drew Kaser
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.2 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #306; model has him #168 — a 138-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Riley Dixon
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #330; model has him #134 — a 196-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Lac EdwardsDrew KaserRiley Dixon· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Lac Edwards

Draftanomics projects Lac Edwards (age 24.0 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #214 (range #193-#235, wide band). Bust probability sits at 21% — manageable. Age 24.0 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 539 spots ahead of the room (board #214 vs consensus #753), and at a 21% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Drew Kaser

Draftanomics projects Drew Kaser (age 23.2 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #168 (range #158-#178, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 35% — real but not disqualifying. Age 23.2 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 138 spots ahead of the room (board #168 vs consensus #306), and at a 35% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Riley Dixon

Draftanomics projects Riley Dixon (age 22.7 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #134 (range #120-#148, wide band). Bust probability sits at 38% — real but not disqualifying. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 196 spots ahead of the room (board #134 vs consensus #330), and at a 38% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.