IND

2027 team hub

Refreshed just now

GM:Chris Ballardhistory →

Scheme:VerticalHybridMatch ZoneSpeed Rusher

Picks

1st @ #15

Draft capital

17.8

more capital than 56% of teams

Top model fit

Leonard Moore

CB · best blend of grade and roster need

Mock as this team

Target boardDraft capitalHaul gradeSchemeCap outlook

IND

2027 team hub

Refreshed just now

GM:Chris Ballardhistory →

Scheme:VerticalHybridMatch ZoneSpeed Rusher

Picks

1st @ #15

Draft capital

17.8

more capital than 56% of teams

Top model fit

Leonard Moore

CB · best blend of grade and roster need

Mock as this team

IND's biggest positional needs

CB / Scritical need

top fit: Leonard Moore (CB)

EDGE / DL / LBcritical need

top fit: Colin Simmons (EDGE)

Offensive lineclear need

top fit: Trevor Goosby (OT)

Who INDshould take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions IND needs rise to the top.

50/50 prospects

Rank↑	Player	Pos	Tier	College	Pos need	Model rank	Fit	Why he fits
1	Leonard Moorerank#2$13M CBBlue Chip· Notre Dame· model #2· critical need	CB	Blue Chip	Notre Dame	critical need	#2	0.94	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
2	Colin Simmonsrank#4$11M EDGEBlue Chip· Texas· model #4· critical need	EDGE	Blue Chip	Texas	critical need	#4	0.93	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
3	KJ Boldenrank#8$8M S1st Round· Georgia· model #8· critical need	S	1st Round	Georgia	critical need	#8	0.91	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
4	William Echolesrank#9$8M DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #9· critical need	DL	1st Round	Ole Miss	critical need	#9	0.88	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
5	Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asarank#12$7M LB1st Round· Notre Dame· model #12· critical need	LB	1st Round	Notre Dame	critical need	#12	0.85	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
6	Trevor Goosbyrank#3$12M OTBlue Chip· Texas· model #3· clear need	OT	Blue Chip	Texas	clear need	#3	0.83	Addresses a clear roster need; the board says top-15 talent.
7	Jordan Seatonrank#5$10M OTBlue Chip· LSU· model #5· clear need	OT	Blue Chip	LSU	clear need	#5	0.81	Addresses a clear roster need; the board says top-15 talent.
8	Jeremiah Smithrank#1$14M WRBlue Chip· Ohio State· model #1	WR	Blue Chip	Ohio State	low need	#1	0.80	A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
9	Kade Pieper DL1st Round· Iowa· model #18· critical need	DL	1st Round	Iowa	critical need	#18	0.79	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
10	David Stonerank#19$5M DL1st Round· Oklahoma· model #19· critical need	DL	1st Round	Oklahoma	critical need	#19	0.79	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
11	Koi Perich S1st Round· Oregon· model #22· critical need	S	1st Round	Oregon	critical need	#22	0.78	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
12	Dylan Stewartrank#24$4M EDGE1st Round· South Carolina· model #24· critical need	EDGE	1st Round	South Carolina	critical need	#24	0.78	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
13	Cam Colemanrank#6$9M WRBlue Chip· Texas· model #6	WR	Blue Chip	Texas	low need	#6	0.77	A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
14	OJ Frederique Jr. CB1st Round· Miami· model #25· critical need	CB	1st Round	Miami	critical need	#25	0.77	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
15	Xavier Scott CB1st Round· Illinois· model #26· critical need	CB	1st Round	Illinois	critical need	#26	0.76	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
16	Dante Moorerank#7 QB1st Round· Oregon· model #7	QB	1st Round	Oregon	low need	#7	0.76	A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
17	A'Mauri Washingtonrank#27$4M DL1st Round· Oregon· model #27· critical need	DL	1st Round	Oregon	critical need	#27	0.76	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
18	Adam Trickrank#30$4M LB1st Round· Texas Tech· model #30· critical need	LB	1st Round	Texas Tech	critical need	#30	0.75	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
19	Quincy Rhodes Jr.rank#31$4M DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #31· critical need	DL	1st Round	Arkansas	critical need	#31	0.74	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
20	Ellis Robinson IVrank#32$4M CB1st Round· Georgia· model #32· critical need	CB	1st Round	Georgia	critical need	#32	0.73	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
21	Sammy Brownrank#34$4M LBDay 2· Clemson· model #34· critical need	LB	Day 2	Clemson	critical need	#34	0.73	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
22	Ryan Williamsrank#10$8M WR1st Round· Alabama· model #10	WR	1st Round	Alabama	low need	#10	0.72	A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
23	Arch Manningrank#11 QB1st Round· Texas· model #11	QB	1st Round	Texas	low need	#11	0.72	A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
24	Cayden Greenrank#13$7M OT1st Round· Missouri· model #13· clear need	OT	1st Round	Missouri	clear need	#13	0.71	Addresses a clear roster need; the board says top-15 talent.
25	Ethan Wesloskirank#40$3M LBDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #40· critical need	LB	Day 2	Oklahoma State	critical need	#40	0.70	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
26	Tony Rojas LBDay 2· Penn State· model #42· critical need	LB	Day 2	Penn State	critical need	#42	0.69	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
27	Ashton Hampton SDay 2· Clemson· model #43· critical need	S	Day 2	Clemson	critical need	#43	0.69	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
28	Trevor Lauck OT1st Round· Iowa· model #16· clear need	OT	1st Round	Iowa	clear need	#16	0.69	Addresses a clear roster need; the board sees a first-rounder.
29	Brauntae Johnsonrank#44$3M SDay 2· Notre Dame· model #44· critical need	S	Day 2	Notre Dame	critical need	#44	0.69	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
30	Zabien Brownrank#46$3M CBDay 2· Alabama· model #46· critical need	CB	Day 2	Alabama	critical need	#46	0.68	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
31	Chris Cole LBDay 2· Georgia· model #48· critical need	LB	Day 2	Georgia	critical need	#48	0.68	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
32	Austin Siereveld G1st Round· Ohio State· model #20· clear need	G	1st Round	Ohio State	clear need	#20	0.68	Addresses a clear roster need; the board sees a first-rounder.
33	Boubacar Traorerank#50$2M DLDay 2· Notre Dame· model #50· critical need	DL	Day 2	Notre Dame	critical need	#50	0.67	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
34	Suntarine Perkins LBDay 2· Ole Miss· model #51· critical need	LB	Day 2	Ole Miss	critical need	#51	0.67	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
35	Damon Wilson IIrank#53$2M EDGEDay 2· Miami· model #53· critical need	EDGE	Day 2	Miami	critical need	#53	0.67	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
36	Dashawn Spears SDay 2· LSU· model #54· critical need	S	Day 2	LSU	critical need	#54	0.67	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
37	Maverick Baranowskirank#55$2M LBDay 2· Minnesota· model #55· critical need	LB	Day 2	Minnesota	critical need	#55	0.67	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
38	Julian Sayinrank#14 QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #14	QB	1st Round	Ohio State	low need	#14	0.66	A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
39	Will Heldtrank#58$2M EDGEDay 2· Clemson· model #58· critical need	EDGE	Day 2	Clemson	critical need	#58	0.66	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
40	Ben Roberts DLDay 2· Michigan State· model #61· critical need	DL	Day 2	Michigan State	critical need	#61	0.66	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
41	Rasheem Bilesrank#15$6M ATH1st Round· Texas· model #15	ATH	1st Round	Texas	low need	#15	0.65	A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
42	Kewan Lacyrank#17$5M RB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #17	RB	1st Round	Ole Miss	low need	#17	0.65	A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
43	Justin Scottrank#63$2M DLDay 2· Miami· model #63· critical need	DL	Day 2	Miami	critical need	#63	0.65	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
44	Jordan Pollard LBDay 2· San José State· model #65· critical need	LB	Day 2	San José State	critical need	#65	0.64	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
45	Matayo Uiagalelei EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #66· critical need	EDGE	Day 2	Oregon	critical need	#66	0.64	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
46	Kelley Jonesrank#68$2M SDay 2· Mississippi State· model #68· critical need	S	Day 2	Mississippi State	critical need	#68	0.64	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
47	Bear Alexander DLDay 2· Oregon· model #71· critical need	DL	Day 2	Oregon	critical need	#71	0.64	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
48	Kam Robinson LBDay 2· Virginia· model #73· critical need	LB	Day 2	Virginia	critical need	#73	0.64	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
49	Devin Smithrank#74$2M LBDay 2· Kentucky· model #74· critical need	LB	Day 2	Kentucky	critical need	#74	0.64	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
50	Jaylen McClain SDay 2· Ohio State· model #75· critical need	S	Day 2	Ohio State	critical need	#75	0.64	Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.