Who CHIshould take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions CHI needs rise to the top.
| Rank↑ | Player | Fit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trevor Goosbyrank#3$12M OTBlue Chip· Texas· model #3· critical need | 0.94 |
| 2 | Jordan Seatonrank#5$10M OTBlue Chip· LSU· model #5· critical need | 0.92 |
| 3 | Colin Simmonsrank#4$11M EDGEBlue Chip· Texas· model #4· critical need | 0.90 |
| 4 | Jeremiah Smithrank#1$14M WRBlue Chip· Ohio State· model #1· critical need | 0.86 |
| 5 | William Echolesrank#9$8M DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #9· critical need | 0.85 |
| 6 | Cam Colemanrank#6$9M WRBlue Chip· Texas· model #6· critical need | 0.83 |
| 7 | Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asarank#12$7M LB1st Round· Notre Dame· model #12· critical need | 0.83 |
| 8 | Cayden Greenrank#13$7M OT1st Round· Missouri· model #13· critical need | 0.82 |
| 9 | OT1st Round· Iowa· model #16· critical need | 0.80 |
| 10 | Ryan Williamsrank#10$8M WR1st Round· Alabama· model #10· critical need | 0.79 |
| 11 | G1st Round· Ohio State· model #20· critical need | 0.79 |
| 12 | Leonard Moorerank#2$13M CBBlue Chip· Notre Dame· model #2 | 0.78 |
| 13 | DL1st Round· Iowa· model #18· critical need | 0.76 |
| 14 | David Stonerank#19$5M DL1st Round· Oklahoma· model #19· critical need | 0.76 |
| 15 | Dante Moorerank#7 QB1st Round· Oregon· model #7 | 0.76 |
| 16 | Dylan Stewartrank#24$4M EDGE1st Round· South Carolina· model #24· critical need | 0.76 |
| 17 | KJ Boldenrank#8$8M S1st Round· Georgia· model #8 | 0.75 |
| 18 | A'Mauri Washingtonrank#27$4M DL1st Round· Oregon· model #27· critical need | 0.74 |
| 19 | Adam Trickrank#30$4M LB1st Round· Texas Tech· model #30· critical need | 0.72 |
| 20 | Arch Manningrank#11 QB1st Round· Texas· model #11 | 0.72 |
| 21 | Kewan Lacyrank#17$5M RB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #17· critical need | 0.71 |
| 22 | Quincy Rhodes Jr.rank#31$4M DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #31· critical need | 0.71 |
| 23 | Sammy Brownrank#34$4M LBDay 2· Clemson· model #34· critical need | 0.70 |
| 24 | Ethan Wesloskirank#40$3M LBDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #40· critical need | 0.68 |
| 25 | Ryan Wingorank#28$4M WR1st Round· Texas· model #28· critical need | 0.67 |
| 26 | LBDay 2· Penn State· model #42· critical need | 0.67 |
| 27 | GDay 2· Ohio State· model #56· critical need | 0.66 |
| 28 | Julian Sayinrank#14 QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #14 | 0.66 |
| 29 | LBDay 2· Georgia· model #48· critical need | 0.65 |
| 30 | Rasheem Bilesrank#15$6M ATH1st Round· Texas· model #15 | 0.65 |
| 31 | Nate Frazierrank#33$4M RBDay 2· Georgia· model #33· critical need | 0.65 |
| 32 | Boubacar Traorerank#50$2M DLDay 2· Notre Dame· model #50· critical need | 0.65 |
| 33 | GDay 2· Oregon· model #64· critical need | 0.65 |
| 34 | LBDay 2· Ole Miss· model #51· critical need | 0.65 |
| 35 | Damon Wilson IIrank#53$2M EDGEDay 2· Miami· model #53· critical need | 0.64 |
| 36 | Maverick Baranowskirank#55$2M LBDay 2· Minnesota· model #55· critical need | 0.64 |
| 37 | OTDay 2· Miami· model #67· critical need | 0.64 |
| 38 | WRDay 2· Arizona State· model #35· critical need | 0.64 |
| 39 | Nick Marshrank#36$4M WRDay 2· Indiana· model #36· critical need | 0.64 |
| 40 | OTDay 2· SMU· model #70· critical need | 0.64 |
| 41 | GDay 2· South Carolina· model #72· critical need | 0.64 |
| 42 | Jamari Johnsonrank#21$5M ATH1st Round· Oregon· model #21 | 0.64 |
| 43 | Will Heldtrank#58$2M EDGEDay 2· Clemson· model #58· critical need | 0.64 |
| 44 | Jadan Baughrank#23$4M ATH1st Round· Florida· model #23 | 0.63 |
| 45 | DLDay 2· Michigan State· model #61· critical need | 0.63 |
| 46 | OTDay 2· Texas· model #83· critical need | 0.63 |
| 47 | S1st Round· Oregon· model #22 | 0.63 |
| 48 | Justin Scottrank#63$2M DLDay 2· Miami· model #63· critical need | 0.62 |
| 49 | LBDay 2· San José State· model #65· critical need | 0.62 |
| 50 | EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #66· critical need | 0.62 |
The house mock ships Trevor Goosby to Chicago at 16, addressing the offensive line hole that tops this board. But the model's loudest signal doesn't wear an O-line jersey — Rasheem Biles sits 15th on the model, 65th in the room, a gap nobody else in this range touches. Trevor Lauck lands in the same range, and the room is nearly as cold on him, valuing him decades below the model's grade. If Chicago wants defensive front help instead of tackle depth, Biles is the disconnect that decides the class.
Written by our models from the live board; every name and number checked