2020 class · 12 prospects

Quarterback QB

The hardest position to model. Tape, processing, and off-script play matter more than box-score numbers — we lean heavily on scout consensus and completion rate over expected.

Likeliest career, by the outcome model.

How many quarterbacks land in each career bucket as the model's single most likely finish. This is a different question from the board grades below — a prospect can be a Day 3 grade and still have “starter” as his likeliest outcome. The tails (elite, bust) are where the model separates; the middle two buckets sit close to a coin flip.

Elite
4
Pro-Bowl-caliber career
Starter
1
Multi-year NFL starter
Role
2
Rotational / depth
Bust
5
Likeliest outcome is a bust
Likeliest career across the QB class
Elite
4
Starter
1
Role
2
Bust
5

The board.

All 12 quarterbacks with a draftable grade on Draftanomics's 2020 board, tier by tier.

Blue Chip1 player

Joe Burrow out of LSU is the blue-chip tier by himself, projected No. 1 overall. The break below is soft: Tua Tagovailoa projects just 7 projected picks after Burrow, so the tier line is a label more than a wall.

1
Joe Burrow
LSU· 6'3" · 221 lb· consensus #2
A blue-chip grade with the room in agreement — consensus No. 2.
Blue Chip
bust risk 6%
1st Round1 player

Tua Tagovailoa out of Alabama is the first-round tier by himself, projected No. 8 overall. Mind the gap after Tagovailoa: Justin Herbert is next, and he is 25 picks away.

8
Tua Tagovailoa
Alabama· 6'0" · 217 lb· consensus #5
A first-round grade with the room in agreement — consensus No. 5.
1st Round
bust risk 19%
Day 24 players

The Day 2 tier runs from Justin Herbert at No. 33 down to Jacob Eason at No. 105. The drop behind Eason is the story — Jake Fromm does not come off the board for another 58 picks. One split worth knowing: consensus puts Jordan Love at No. 35, 39 spots above our call.

33
Justin Herbert
Oregon· 6'6" · 236 lb· consensus #17
A Day 2 grade, though the room is higher on him — consensus No. 17.
Day 2
bust risk 13%
74
Jordan Love
Utah St.· consensus #35
A Day 2 grade, though the room is higher on him — consensus No. 35.
Day 2
bust risk 24%
94
Jalen Hurts
Oklahoma· 6'1" · 222 lb· consensus #104
A Day 2 grade with the room in agreement — consensus No. 104.
Day 2
bust risk 4%
105
Jacob Eason
Washington· 6'6" · 231 lb· consensus #83
A Day 2 grade, though the room is higher on him — consensus No. 83.
Day 2
bust risk 23%
Day 36 players

Jake Fromm leads a 6-deep Day 3 group — the meat of the QB board — starting at a projected No. 163 overall. One split worth knowing: consensus puts James Morgan at No. 163, 52 spots above our call.

163
Jake Fromm
Georgia· 6'2" · 219 lb· consensus #150
A Day 3 grade with the room in agreement — consensus No. 150.
Day 3
bust risk 35%
198
Nate Stanley
Iowa· 6'4" · 235 lb
A Day 3 grade, No. 198 on our board.
Day 3
bust risk 34%
215
James Morgan
Florida International· 6'4" · 229 lb· consensus #163
A Day 3 grade, though the room is higher on him — consensus No. 163.
Day 3
bust risk 39%
226
Tommy Stevens
Mississippi St.
A Day 3 grade, No. 226 on our board.
Day 3
bust risk 26%