Haul grades · 2025

Post-draft letter grade for every team. Each grade composites four dimensions: value (pick-value efficiency vs the Chase Stuart chart), need (share of picks at roster-need positions), risk (higher = safer, less bust exposure), and model agreement (share of picks that matched Draftanomics's read at the time).

CINB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 23.5 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
97
NEED
100
RISK
58
MODEL
33
6 picks
NYJB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 19.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
89
NEED
86
RISK
69
MODEL
57
7 picks
CARB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 17.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
85
NEED
88
RISK
54
MODEL
50
8 picks
LVRB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 22.5 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (82% of picks).
VALUE
95
NEED
82
RISK
62
MODEL
18
11 picks
DETB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 18.6 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
87
NEED
86
RISK
58
MODEL
29
7 picks
LACB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 16.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (78% of picks).
VALUE
82
NEED
78
RISK
57
MODEL
44
9 picks
TAMB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 10.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
72
NEED
100
RISK
66
MODEL
33
6 picks
DENC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 14.3 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
79
NEED
86
RISK
54
MODEL
14
7 picks
LARC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 13.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
78
NEED
100
RISK
44
MODEL
17
6 picks
GNBC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks).
VALUE
70
NEED
75
RISK
61
MODEL
38
8 picks
BUFC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
67
NEED
88
RISK
49
MODEL
25
8 picks
PITC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
63
NEED
86
RISK
55
MODEL
43
7 picks
MINC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
62
NEED
100
RISK
61
MODEL
20
5 picks
CHIC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
49
NEED
88
RISK
64
MODEL
63
8 picks
SFOC
Solid value haul (picks averaged 17.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (82% of picks).
VALUE
86
NEED
82
RISK
47
MODEL
0
11 picks
TENC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (78% of picks).
VALUE
70
NEED
78
RISK
59
MODEL
11
9 picks
SEAC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (82% of picks).
VALUE
53
NEED
82
RISK
61
MODEL
27
11 picks
NORC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (78% of picks).
VALUE
52
NEED
78
RISK
51
MODEL
44
9 picks
CLEC
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 10.1 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
30
NEED
100
RISK
74
MODEL
43
7 picks
WASC
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 10.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
28
NEED
80
RISK
75
MODEL
60
5 picks
BALC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (82% of picks).
VALUE
51
NEED
82
RISK
56
MODEL
9
11 picks
HOUC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
48
NEED
89
RISK
54
MODEL
11
9 picks
ARIC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 8.3 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
33
NEED
86
RISK
60
MODEL
29
7 picks
MIAD+
Value-neutral haul.
VALUE
48
NEED
63
RISK
36
MODEL
38
8 picks
INDD+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks).
VALUE
39
NEED
75
RISK
52
MODEL
25
8 picks
NYGD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 17.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
15
NEED
86
RISK
67
MODEL
43
7 picks
KAND+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 21.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
8
NEED
100
RISK
52
MODEL
43
7 picks
ATLD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 16.6 spots above our board's price). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
17
NEED
60
RISK
68
MODEL
40
5 picks
DALD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 30.1 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
53
MODEL
22
9 picks
JAXF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 20.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (78% of picks).
VALUE
9
NEED
78
RISK
59
MODEL
22
9 picks
PHIF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 21.1 spots above our board's price).
VALUE
8
NEED
60
RISK
51
MODEL
50
10 picks
NWEF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 42.9 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (73% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
73
RISK
60
MODEL
18
11 picks