Haul grades · 2023

Post-draft letter grade for every team. Each grade composites four dimensions: value (pick-value efficiency vs the Chase Stuart chart), need (share of picks at roster-need positions), risk (higher = safer, less bust exposure), and model agreement (share of picks that matched Draftanomics's read at the time).

KANB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 38.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
55
MODEL
29
7 picks
LACB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 30.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
100
NEED
86
RISK
76
MODEL
14
7 picks
TAMB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 46.1 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
36
MODEL
25
8 picks
MIAB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 10.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
72
NEED
75
RISK
74
MODEL
75
4 picks
CARB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 29.6 spots of value against our board).
VALUE
100
NEED
60
RISK
64
MODEL
20
5 picks
LVRB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 24.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
98
NEED
89
RISK
43
MODEL
22
9 picks
MINB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 14.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks).
VALUE
80
NEED
83
RISK
48
MODEL
33
6 picks
DETB-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
61
NEED
88
RISK
68
MODEL
50
8 picks
LARC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 13.5 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
77
NEED
86
RISK
36
MODEL
29
14 picks
NORC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.7 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
73
NEED
86
RISK
72
MODEL
14
7 picks
DALC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 10.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
71
NEED
100
RISK
48
MODEL
25
8 picks
ARIC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
43
NEED
100
RISK
59
MODEL
44
9 picks
WASC
Solid value haul (picks averaged 12.7 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (71% of picks).
VALUE
75
NEED
71
RISK
63
MODEL
14
7 picks
JAXC
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.7 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks).
VALUE
73
NEED
75
RISK
49
MODEL
25
12 picks
SEAC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks).
VALUE
66
NEED
80
RISK
56
MODEL
20
10 picks
NWEC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks).
VALUE
61
NEED
83
RISK
55
MODEL
33
12 picks
SFOC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
58
NEED
89
RISK
50
MODEL
22
9 picks
TENC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks).
VALUE
39
NEED
83
RISK
56
MODEL
33
6 picks
CLEC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 8.1 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
34
NEED
100
RISK
62
MODEL
29
7 picks
GNBD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 13.2 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (92% of picks).
VALUE
24
NEED
92
RISK
48
MODEL
23
13 picks
BUFD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 14.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
21
NEED
100
RISK
54
MODEL
33
6 picks
HOUD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 15.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
18
NEED
100
RISK
60
MODEL
22
9 picks
DEND+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 18.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
13
NEED
100
RISK
77
MODEL
20
5 picks
CIND
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 10.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
29
NEED
88
RISK
46
MODEL
13
8 picks
NYJD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 15.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
20
NEED
100
RISK
54
MODEL
0
7 picks
PHID
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 17.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
16
NEED
86
RISK
47
MODEL
29
7 picks
INDD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 19.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (92% of picks).
VALUE
12
NEED
92
RISK
49
MODEL
17
12 picks
ATLD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 27.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
60
MODEL
17
6 picks
BALD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 25.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
77
MODEL
0
6 picks
PITD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 27.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
61
MODEL
29
7 picks
CHIF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 25.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (70% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
70
RISK
58
MODEL
30
10 picks
NYGF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 36.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
52
MODEL
0
7 picks