Haul grades · 2015

Post-draft letter grade for every team. Each grade composites four dimensions: value (pick-value efficiency vs the Chase Stuart chart), need (share of picks at roster-need positions), risk (higher = safer, less bust exposure), and model agreement (share of picks that matched Draftanomics's read at the time).

NYJB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 38.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
83
RISK
62
MODEL
50
6 picks
HOUB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 30.9 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
46
MODEL
14
7 picks
INDB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 41.1 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
39
MODEL
25
8 picks
NORB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 41.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
89
RISK
50
MODEL
22
9 picks
SDGB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 44.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
51
MODEL
0
5 picks
ARIB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 22.3 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
95
NEED
100
RISK
44
MODEL
29
7 picks
CINB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 13.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
76
NEED
100
RISK
40
MODEL
44
9 picks
JAXC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 20.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
91
NEED
88
RISK
54
MODEL
0
8 picks
TAMC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 17.7 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
85
NEED
86
RISK
49
MODEL
14
7 picks
CHIC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 13.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
76
NEED
83
RISK
69
MODEL
17
6 picks
STLC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
73
NEED
88
RISK
54
MODEL
25
8 picks
ATLC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
65
NEED
100
RISK
56
MODEL
29
7 picks
KANC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
56
NEED
100
RISK
59
MODEL
22
9 picks
MIAC
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.6 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (71% of picks).
VALUE
73
NEED
71
RISK
64
MODEL
14
7 picks
DENC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
64
NEED
100
RISK
55
MODEL
0
8 picks
BUFC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
57
NEED
100
RISK
65
MODEL
0
6 picks
CLEC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
54
NEED
100
RISK
38
MODEL
33
12 picks
GNBC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
63
NEED
100
RISK
40
MODEL
0
8 picks
NYGC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
54
NEED
100
RISK
49
MODEL
0
6 picks
WASC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks).
VALUE
41
NEED
80
RISK
61
MODEL
20
10 picks
DETC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
35
NEED
100
RISK
75
MODEL
0
7 picks
PITC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 11.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
27
NEED
100
RISK
44
MODEL
50
8 picks
BALD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 10.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
29
NEED
100
RISK
59
MODEL
0
9 picks
CARD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 17.2 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
16
NEED
80
RISK
68
MODEL
40
5 picks
PHID+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 17.3 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
15
NEED
100
RISK
51
MODEL
33
6 picks
SFOD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 15.3 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (90% of picks).
VALUE
19
NEED
90
RISK
52
MODEL
10
10 picks
OAKD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 18.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
14
NEED
100
RISK
53
MODEL
20
10 picks
DALD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 29.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
51
MODEL
38
8 picks
MINF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 24.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
58
MODEL
10
10 picks
NWEF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 33.5 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (91% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
91
RISK
57
MODEL
9
11 picks
SEAF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 61.5 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
75
RISK
42
MODEL
13
8 picks
TENF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 37.2 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
89
RISK
63
MODEL
11
9 picks