Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2022 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2022 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (OL)
LG
Luke Goedeke
OL · Central Michigan
— · — · —
SB
Spencer Burford
OL · Texas-San Antonio
— · — · —
LS
Lecitus Smith
OL · Virginia Tech
— · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Luke Goedeke
Predicted pick
#47
range #22–#72
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
0%comp-based · 0/5
Consensus rank
#96
on 10 boards
Career arc
Contributor
tier · Day 2
2nd-deal AAV
$18Mmodel
Spencer Burford
Predicted pick
#162
range #143–#181
Bust probability· rough estimate
15%
0%comp-based · 0/5
Consensus rank
#157
on 1 board
Career arc
Contributor
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel
Lecitus Smith
Predicted pick
#153
range #131–#175
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
0%comp-based · 0/5
Consensus rank
#139
on 5 boards
Career arc
Contributor
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Luke Goedeke· Offensive line
  • Spencer Burford· Offensive line
  • Lecitus Smith· Offensive line
Axis leaders
  • ProductionLuke Goedeke50
  • AthleticismLuke Goedeke24
  • AgeSpencer Burford60
  • ConsensusSpencer Burford21
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Luke Goedeke50
  • Breakout ageLuke Goedeke50
  • WorkloadLuke Goedeke50
  • RAS × productionLuke Goedeke0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Logan StenbergG · Bust→ shared byLuke GoedekeSpencer BurfordLecitus Smith
  • Hakeem AdenijiOT · Contributor→ shared byLuke GoedekeSpencer BurfordLecitus Smith
  • Justin HerronOT · Contributor→ shared bySpencer BurfordLecitus Smith
Luke Goedeke
  • Logan Stenbergshared
    G · #121
    Bust
  • Hakeem Adenijishared
    OT · #180
    Contributor
  • Ben Bartch
    G · #116
    Contributor
  • Josh Jones
    OT · #72
    Starter
  • Matt Hennessy
    C · #78
    Contributor
Spencer Burford
  • Logan Stenbergshared
    G · #121
    Bust
  • Justin Herronshared
    OT · #195
    Contributor
  • Hakeem Adenijishared
    OT · #180
    Contributor
  • Charlie Heck
    OT · #126
    Contributor
  • Nick Harris
    C · #160
    Contributor
Lecitus Smith
  • Justin Herronshared
    OT · #195
    Contributor
  • Hakeem Adenijishared
    OT · #180
    Contributor
  • Logan Stenbergshared
    G · #121
    Bust
  • Colton McKivitz
    OT · #153
    Starter
  • Tyre Phillips
    OT · #106
    Contributor

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Luke Goedeke
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    11 boards place him at mean rank #79; model has him #47 — a 32-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
  • Comp group has bust risk
    1 of 2 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Logan Stenberg. Mixed signal from history.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Spencer Burford
Risks
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 4.47 (44th percentile at OL). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
Opportunities
  • Mid-major standout
    School SP+ 6.5 (AMERICAN ATHLETIC). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition.
Lecitus Smith
Risks
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 4.13 (41th percentile at OL). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
  • Comp group has bust risk
    1 of 2 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Logan Stenberg. Mixed signal from history.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    6 boards have him at mean rank #103; model has him #153 — a 50-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Luke GoedekeSpencer BurfordLecitus Smith· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Luke Goedeke

Draftanomics projects Luke Goedeke as a Day 2 pick at #47 (range #22-#72, wide band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is mixed: 1 starters-or-better vs 1 backups-or-busts among the 2 comps with known outcomes. Closest comps: Logan Stenberg (Bust), Hakeem Adeniji (Contributor), Ben Bartch (Contributor). Ceiling is Josh Jones (Starter); floor is Hakeem Adeniji (Contributor). 1 of 2 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Logan Stenberg. Mixed signal from history. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 32 spots ahead of the room (board #47 vs consensus #79), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Spencer Burford

Draftanomics projects Spencer Burford as a mid-round flyer at #162 (range #143-#181, wide band). Bust probability sits at 15% — manageable. The comp set leans young — most of his closest comps haven't played enough NFL snaps yet to be confidently graded. Closest comps: Logan Stenberg (Bust), Justin Herron (Contributor), Hakeem Adeniji (Contributor). Ceiling is Charlie Heck (Contributor); floor is Justin Herron (Contributor). School SP+ 6.5 (AMERICAN ATHLETIC). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition. RAS 4.47 (44th percentile at OL). Athleticism is average at best for the position. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #162 sits within 8 spots of the room's #154 — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 15% bust probability break ties on draft day.

Lecitus Smith

Draftanomics projects Lecitus Smith as a mid-round flyer at #153 (range #131-#175, wide band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is mixed: 1 starters-or-better vs 1 backups-or-busts among the 2 comps with known outcomes. Closest comps: Justin Herron (Contributor), Hakeem Adeniji (Contributor), Logan Stenberg (Bust). Ceiling is Colton McKivitz (Starter); floor is Justin Herron (Contributor). RAS 4.13 (41th percentile at OL). Athleticism is average at best for the position. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #103 and the model won't take him before #153 — a 50-spot markdown. The discount is earned — average-to-below athletic profile leads the case against.