Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2017 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2017 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (LB)
EL
Elijah Lee
LB · Kansas St.
21.2 yo · — · —
TV
Tanner Vallejo
LB · Boise St.
22.4 yo · — · —
JB
Jayon Brown
LB · UCLA
22.2 yo · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Elijah Lee
Predicted pick
#124
range #122–#126
Bust probability
20%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel
Tanner Vallejo
Predicted pick
#215
range #174–#256
Bust probability
40%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Franchise
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel
Jayon Brown
Predicted pick
#131
range #96–#166
Bust probability
39%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Franchise
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$6Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Elijah Lee· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Tanner Vallejo· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Jayon Brown· EDGE / DL / LB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionElijah Lee0
  • AthleticismElijah Lee36
  • AgeElijah Lee94
  • ConsensusElijah Lee6
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Elijah Lee50
  • Breakout ageElijah Lee50
  • WorkloadElijah Lee100
  • RAS × productionElijah Lee31

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Martrell SpaightOLB · Contributor→ shared byTanner VallejoJayon Brown
  • Shaquille RiddickEDGE · TBD→ shared byTanner VallejoJayon Brown
  • Nate OrchardEDGE · Franchise→ shared byTanner VallejoJayon Brown
  • Bud DupreeOLB · Franchise→ shared byTanner VallejoJayon Brown
Elijah Lee
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Tanner Vallejo
  • Martrell Spaightshared
    OLB · #141
    Contributor
  • Shaquille Riddickshared
    EDGE · #158
    TBD
  • Nate Orchardshared
    EDGE · #51
    Franchise
  • Bud Dupreeshared
    OLB · #22
    Franchise
  • Leonard Williams
    EDGE · #6
    Franchise
Jayon Brown
  • Nate Orchardshared
    EDGE · #51
    Franchise
  • Shaquille Riddickshared
    EDGE · #158
    TBD
  • Bud Dupreeshared
    OLB · #22
    Franchise
  • Martrell Spaightshared
    OLB · #141
    Contributor
  • Randy Gregory
    OLB · #60
    Starter

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Elijah Lee
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #322; model has him #124 — a 198-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Tanner Vallejo
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #255; model has him #215 — a 40-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
  • Below-cohort college production
    Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.05 — well below the front7 average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Opportunities
  • Strong comp group
    3 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Nate Orchard, Bud Dupree, Leonard Williams. The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.
Jayon Brown
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #437; model has him #131 — a 306-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
  • Strong comp group
    3 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Nate Orchard, Bud Dupree, Randy Gregory. The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Elijah LeeTanner VallejoJayon Brown· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Elijah Lee

Draftanomics projects Elijah Lee (age 21.2 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #124 (range #122-#126, tight projection). Bust probability sits at 20% — manageable. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 198 spots ahead of the room (board #124 vs consensus #322), and at a 20% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Tanner Vallejo

Draftanomics projects Tanner Vallejo (age 22.4 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #215 (range #174-#256, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 40% — real but not disqualifying. The comp set is strong: 3 of 3 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Martrell Spaight (Contributor), Shaquille Riddick, Nate Orchard (Franchise). Ceiling is Leonard Williams (Franchise); floor is Shaquille Riddick. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 40 spots ahead of the room (board #215 vs consensus #255), and at a 40% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Jayon Brown

Draftanomics projects Jayon Brown (age 22.2 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #131 (range #96-#166, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 39% — real but not disqualifying. The comp set is strong: 3 of 3 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Nate Orchard (Franchise), Shaquille Riddick, Bud Dupree (Franchise). Ceiling is Bud Dupree (Franchise); floor is Shaquille Riddick. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 306 spots ahead of the room (board #131 vs consensus #437), and at a 39% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.