Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2017 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2017 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (S)
LH
Lano Hill
S · Michigan
21.4 yo · — · —
RF
Rudy Ford
S · Auburn
22.5 yo · — · —
MW
Marcus Williams
S · Utah
20.6 yo · 6'1" · 202 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Lano Hill
Predicted pick
#105
range #73–#137
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
0%comp-based · 0/4
Consensus rank
#137
on 1 board
Career arc
Franchise
tier · Day 2
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel
Rudy Ford
Predicted pick
#247
range #233–#261
Bust probability· rough estimate
13%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel
Marcus Williams
Predicted pick
#26
range #1–#56
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
0%comp-based · 0/4
Consensus rank
#57
on 19 boards
Career arc
Franchise
tier · 1st Round
2nd-deal AAV
$16Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Lano Hill· CB / S
  • Rudy Ford· CB / S
  • Marcus Williams· CB / S
Axis leaders
  • ProductionLano Hill0
  • AthleticismLano Hill36
  • AgeLano Hill89
  • ConsensusLano Hill20
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Lano Hill50
  • Breakout ageLano Hill50
  • WorkloadLano Hill100
  • RAS × productionLano Hill53

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Adrian AmosS · Franchise→ shared byLano HillMarcus Williams
  • Cedric ThompsonS · TBD→ shared byLano HillMarcus Williams
  • Mykkele ThompsonS · Bust→ shared byLano HillMarcus Williams
Lano Hill
  • Landon Collins
    S · #33
    Franchise
  • Adrian Amosshared
    S · #142
    Franchise
  • Jordan Richards
    S · #64
    Contributor
  • Cedric Thompsonshared
    S · #150
    TBD
  • Mykkele Thompsonshared
    S · #144
    Bust
Rudy Ford
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Marcus Williams
  • Adrian Amosshared
    S · #142
    Franchise
  • Damarious Randall
    S · #30
    Franchise
  • Cedric Thompsonshared
    S · #150
    TBD
  • Mykkele Thompsonshared
    S · #144
    Bust
  • Ibraheim Campbell
    S · #115
    Starter

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Lano Hill
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    2 boards place him at mean rank #146; model has him #105 — a 42-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
  • Promising comp group
    2 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes hit Starter-or-better: Landon Collins, Adrian Amos.
Rudy Ford
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    1 board have him at mean rank #134; model has him #247 — a 113-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Marcus Williams
Risks
No major risks flagged.
Opportunities
  • Strong comp group
    3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Adrian Amos, Damarious Randall, Ibraheim Campbell. The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Lano HillRudy FordMarcus Williams· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Lano Hill

Draftanomics projects Lano Hill (age 21.4 at draft) as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #105 (range #73-#137, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is strong: 2 of 3 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Landon Collins (Franchise), Adrian Amos (Franchise), Jordan Richards (Contributor). Ceiling is Landon Collins (Franchise); floor is Cedric Thompson. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 42 spots ahead of the room (board #105 vs consensus #146), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Rudy Ford

Draftanomics projects Rudy Ford (age 22.5 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #247 (range #233-#261, wide band). Bust probability sits at 12% — low. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #134 and the model won't take him before #247 — a 113-spot markdown. The 113-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.

Marcus Williams

Draftanomics projects Marcus Williams (age 20.6 at draft) as a first-round pick at #26 (range #1-#56, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is strong: 3 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Adrian Amos (Franchise), Damarious Randall (Franchise), Cedric Thompson. Ceiling is Damarious Randall (Franchise); floor is Cedric Thompson. The call is a value lean: #26 against a consensus #55 is a 29-spot edge — enough to move him up the queue, not enough to reach a round early.