Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2016 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2016 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (TE)
DM
David Morgan
TE · Texas-San Antonio
22.9 yo · 6'4" · 262 lb
TH
Temarrick Hemingway
TE · South Carolina St.
22.7 yo · — · —
JA
Jerell Adams
TE · South Carolina
23.3 yo · 6'5" · 247 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

David Morgan
Predicted pick
#231
range #229–#233
Bust probability
66%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel
Temarrick Hemingway
Predicted pick
#145
range #124–#166
Bust probability
44%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel
Jerell Adams
Predicted pick
#216
range #214–#218
Bust probability
0%
Consensus rank
#102
on 4 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • David Morgan· RB / WR / TE
  • Temarrick Hemingway· RB / WR / TE
  • Jerell Adams· RB / WR / TE
Axis leaders
  • ProductionDavid Morgan85
  • AthleticismDavid Morgan45
  • AgeTemarrick Hemingway70
  • ConsensusJerell Adams27
  • Per-play impact (PPA)David Morgan50
  • Breakout ageDavid Morgan50
  • WorkloadDavid Morgan100
  • RAS × productionDavid Morgan0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
David Morgan
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Temarrick Hemingway
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Jerell Adams
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

David Morgan
Risks
  • Missed entire rookie season
    Drafted #188 by MIN in 2016 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have.
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #768; model has him #231 — a 537-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Temarrick Hemingway
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #242; model has him #145 — a 97-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Jerell Adams
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.3 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Below-cohort college production
    Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.93 — well below the skill average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    5 boards have him at mean rank #74; model has him #216 — a 142-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
David MorganTemarrick HemingwayJerell Adams· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

David Morgan

Draftanomics projects David Morgan (age 22.9 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #231 (range #229-#233, tight projection). Bust probability sits at 66% — scary. Drafted #188 by MIN in 2016 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 537 spots ahead of the room (board #231 vs consensus #768) — but size the bet for the 66% bust probability; this is a price edge, not a safety edge.

Temarrick Hemingway

Draftanomics projects Temarrick Hemingway (age 22.7 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #145 (range #124-#166, wide band). Bust probability sits at 44% — real but not disqualifying. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 97 spots ahead of the room (board #145 vs consensus #242), and at a 44% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Jerell Adams

Draftanomics projects Jerell Adams (age 23.3 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #216 (range #214-#218, tight projection). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. Age 23.3 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #74 and the model won't take him before #216 — a 142-spot markdown. The discount is earned — older prospect leads the case against.