Refreshed just now
Limited public-board coverage (2 boards) — grade leans on stats + athleticism alone
Backtest: model vs. reality
The model graded Joshua Ezeudu at pick #93; he was actually picked #67 by NYG. 3 NFL seasons in, he's hung on the fringe of the rotation (grading 6.7 of 20 per season), and the market has paid him — a second deal at $1.3M a year. The 4-tier model has him as a likely role.
Overview
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Draftanomics's take
Draftanomics had Joshua Ezeudu at #93 on draft night — a Day 2 grade — and NYG took him at No. 67. The model's case leans on his age curve. Bust risk projects at 4%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade. The room had him #101 pre-draft; our board was 8 spots higher.
Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 3, and it updates whenever the model does. See for what drives the take.
Scouting report
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Why this grade
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
Consensus
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Production
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Risk
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
Team fit
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Will he be there?
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Comps
Historical players this prospect resembles
Film & notes
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports