Refreshed just now
rank#169$1M
FBS Independents→ CIN's 2020 class
Limited public-board coverage (1 board) — grade leans on stats + athleticism alone
Backtest: model vs. reality
The model graded Khalid Kareem at pick #169; he was actually picked #147 by CIN. 6 NFL seasons in, he's hung on the fringe of the rotation (grading 5.3 of 20 per season), and the market has paid him — a second deal at $0.9M a year. The 4-tier model has him as a likely role. NFL grades have been modest so far (0% recent-3, 0% peak across 5 seasons).
Overview
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Draftanomics Rank
Medium conviction#169EDGE·Notre Dame
The league moved faster than our board — CIN took him at No. 147, 22 picks ahead of our No. 169 grade. His career is settling that argument now.
Draftanomics's take
Draftanomics had Khalid Kareem at #169 on draft night — a Day 3 grade — and CIN took him at No. 147, 22 picks earlier than our grade. The model's case leans on his recruiting pedigree. Bust risk projects at 12%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade. The room had him #153 pre-draft; our board sat 16 spots lower.
Scouting report
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Why this grade
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
Consensus
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Production5
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Risk
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
Team fit
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Will he be there?
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Comps
Historical players this prospect resembles
Film & notes
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports