The model graded Hunter Henry at pick #24; he was actually picked #35 by SDG. 2 NFL seasons in, he's producing like a real starter (grading 13.2 of 20 per season). Model expects a second-deal AAV around $22M/yr.
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
We had him No. 24 on draft night, and the league mostly agreed — SDG took him at No. 35. The seasons since are the scoreboard.
Draftanomics had Hunter Henry at #24 on draft night — a 1st round grade — and SDG took him at No. 35. The model's case leans on broad top-100 board coverage. Bust risk projects at 7%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade. The room had him #50 pre-draft; our board was 26 spots higher.
Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 1, and it updates whenever the model does. See methodology for what drives the take.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Historical players this prospect resembles
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports
Too early to project a career arc.
No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.
15 public boards track this prospect. Per-board breakdown loads with the live board.
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
Working in his favor: how many boards rank him top-100. Working against him: athleticism (combine) and his charted total career snaps.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
Not enough to go on yet — no public board ranks him and there's no production or testing data to anchor a career projection.
Everything that could go wrong with Hunter Henry, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Roster-based need returns once the 2015 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 24, and which of them already spent premium capital at RB / WR / TE in the 2015 draft.
Gold means no recent premium investment at RB / WR / TE — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.