The model graded Kamalei Correa at pick #103; he was actually picked #42 by BAL. 2 NFL seasons in, he's barely gotten on the field (grading 2.1 of 20 per season).
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
The league moved faster than our board — BAL took him at No. 42, 61 picks ahead of our No. 103 grade. His career is settling that argument now.
Draftanomics had Kamalei Correa at #103 on draft night — a Day 2 grade — and BAL took him at No. 42, 61 picks earlier than our grade. Bust risk projects at 0%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade. The room had him #75 pre-draft; our board sat 28 spots lower.
Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 3, and it updates whenever the model does. See methodology for what drives the take.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Historical players this prospect resembles
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports
Too early to project a career arc.
No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.
13 public boards track this prospect. Per-board breakdown loads with the live board.
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
Working in his favor: his charted coverage grade career avg. Working against him: his charted average depth of target allowed, career avg and his charted total career snaps.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
Not enough to go on yet — no public board ranks him and there's no production or testing data to anchor a career projection.
Everything that could go wrong with Kamalei Correa, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Roster-based need returns once the 2015 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 103, and which of them already spent premium capital at EDGE / DL / LB in the 2015 draft.
Gold means no recent premium investment at EDGE / DL / LB — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.