Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2015 board/
  3. Tony Lippett
Refreshed just now
Tony Lippett
2015 NFL Draft prospect

Tony Lippett

WR·Michigan St.·Big Ten
age 22.8 · 6'2" · 192 lb
236
Big Ten→ MIA's 2015 class
Print sheet
⚠Limited public-board coverage (0 boards) — grade leans on stats + athleticism alone
Backtest: model vs. reality

The model graded Tony Lippett at pick #236; he was actually picked #156 by MIA. 2 NFL seasons in, he's hung on the fringe of the rotation (grading 6.1 of 20 per season), and the second-contract question is still open — no new deal yet.

Tony LippettWRDraftanomics #236
Print
Dossier
OverviewScouting reportWhy this gradeConsensusProductionRiskTeam fitWill he be there?CompsFilm & notes

Overview

Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take

Draftanomics's take

Draftanomics had Tony Lippett at #236 on draft night — a Day 3 grade — and MIA took him at No. 156. Bust risk projects at 11%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade.

Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 7, and it updates whenever the model does. See methodology for what drives the take.

Scouting report

The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet

Why this grade

Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English

Consensus

The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it

Production

Measurables, traits, and college play quality

Risk

Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem

Team fit

How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes

Will he be there?

Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks

Comps

Historical players this prospect resembles

Film & notes

Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports

Draftanomics Pick?
#236
Day 3range #99–#251 · volatile
Bust Probability?
11%
Low risk(class baseline unavailable)
Actual NFL Pick?
#156
MIA · Rd 5
Career Outcome · 2 seasons?
12.3
6.1 / season avg
Career outlook

Career outlook

How this is built →
5-year career arc

Too early to project a career arc.

No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.

Second contract · not yet
No second deal yet
4 seasons in, still on the rookie contract.
We projected $4.5M/yr on draft night — the market hasn't paid it yet, and that gap is the honest read.
Bust risk
11%
Public-board consensus

No public-board coverage yet.

Pin a team in your account to see how this prospect fits your roster + cap.
Scout note
Private to this device — saved to your browser, never sent to a server.
Empty notes are auto-deleted.
Verdict
Model lower than NFL
Gap (actual − predicted)
-80

Film

Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.

The grade is held down by how many boards rank him top-100, production trajectory, and scout consensus.

Production trajectory
-0.03
Scout consensus
-0.02
Age
-0.01
School strength
-0.01

Model read

Model grade
0.31 of 1
Confidence?
99%
Predicted round
7

The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.

Pulling the boards…
Mock-draft consensus
Pulling the mocks…
4-tier outlook?

Not enough to go on yet — no public board ranks him and there's no production or testing data to anchor a career projection.

Risk dashboard

Elevated risk — watch the flags

Risk score24· WATCH

Everything that could go wrong with Tony Lippett, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.

  • Public-board coverage0 sources
    No public big board has ranked this prospect yet. The grade rests entirely on stats, measurables, and age — hold it loosely.
  • Predicted-pick range#99–251 · 152-pick spread
    The model's own projections scatter widely for this prospect — the landing spot is genuinely uncertain.
  • Bust probability11%
    Low bust risk by the model's read.
  • Age22.8 yrs
    Within the typical WR draft-age band (~23).
Scheme context
Loading…
Scout reports
Paste in any scouting report you trust; Draftanomics pulls out the concrete claims so you can weigh them against the model on the same page.
Loading…

    Who picks where he’s projected

    Roster-based need returns once the 2014 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 236, and which of them already spent premium capital at RB / WR / TE in the 2014 draft.

    NO · No. 230TB · No. 231MIN · No. 232KC · No. 233BUF · No. 234HOU · No. 235DAL · No. 236PHI · No. 237

    Gold means no recent premium investment at RB / WR / TE — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.