Refreshed just now
Limited public-board coverage (0 boards) — grade leans on stats + athleticism alone
Backtest: model vs. reality
The model graded T.J. Clemmings at pick #100; he was actually picked #110 by MIN.
Overview
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Draftanomics Rank
Low conviction#100OT·Pittsburgh
We had him No. 100 on draft night, and the league mostly agreed — MIN took him at No. 110. The seasons since are the scoreboard.
Draftanomics's take
Draftanomics had T.J. Clemmings at #100 on draft night — a Day 2 grade — and MIN took him at No. 110. Bust risk projects at 6%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade.
Scouting report
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Why this grade
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
Consensus
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Production
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Risk
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
Team fit
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Will he be there?
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Comps
Historical players this prospect resembles
Film & notes
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports