The model graded Justin Jones at pick #142; he was actually picked #84 by LAC. 7 NFL seasons in, he's carved out a genuine role (grading 8.4 of 20 per season), and the market has paid him — a second deal at $6.0M a year. The 4-tier model gives him a 31% chance at an elite career. NFL grades have been modest so far (6% recent-3, 16% peak across 7 seasons). Model predicted $15M/yr; actual $6M (over by $9M).
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
The league moved faster than our board — LAC took him at No. 84, 58 picks ahead of our No. 142 grade. His career is settling that argument now.
Draftanomics had Justin Jones at #142 on draft night — a Day 3 grade — and LAC took him at No. 84, 58 picks earlier than our grade. The model's case leans on his age curve. Bust risk projects at 20%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade. The room had him #162 pre-draft; our board was 20 spots higher.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Historical players this prospect resembles
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports
Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 5, and it updates whenever the model does. See methodology for what drives the take.
Read the two ends and skim the middle: the model has a real track record telling stars and busts apart, but “solid starter vs. rotation guy” is close to a coin flip from public data — that's why those two bars are grayed. For his odds of outright busting, the Bust-risk panel next door is the number to trust.
1 public board track this prospect. Per-board breakdown loads with the live board.
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
Working in his favor: his charted def grade mean and age. Working against him: how many boards rank him top-100.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
Outcome shares from the 4-tier model. The Bust share here is a different model than the headline bust probability — for bust risk, use that number.
Everything that could go wrong with Justin Jones, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Roster-based need returns once the 2017 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 142, and which of them already spent premium capital at EDGE / DL / LB in the 2017 draft.
Gold means no recent premium investment at EDGE / DL / LB — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.