Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2015 board/
  3. Kennard Backman
Refreshed just now
Kennard Backman
2015 NFL Draft prospect

Kennard Backman

TE·Ala-Birmingham
age 22.2

On the live board, bust risk sits at 27% and the realistic range is No. 92 to No. 242.

149
→ GNB's 2015 class
Print sheet
⚠Limited public-board coverage (0 boards) — grade leans on stats + athleticism alone
Backtest: model vs. reality

The model graded Kennard Backman at pick #149; he was actually picked #213 by GNB. 1 NFL season in, he's barely gotten on the field (grading 1.3 of 20 per season). So far, the league's caution is winning the argument. Model expects a second-deal AAV around $5M/yr.

Kennard BackmanTEDraftanomics #149
Print
Dossier
OverviewScouting reportWhy this gradeConsensusProductionRisk2Team fit5Will he be there?Comps0Film & notes

Overview

Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take

Draftanomics Rank
Medium conviction
#149TE·Ala-Birmingham

We had him No. 149 on draft night; GNB didn't call his name until No. 213 — a 64-pick gap between our board and the league's. His career is settling that argument now.

Scouting report

The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet

Why this grade

Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English

Consensus

The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it

Production

Measurables, traits, and college play quality

Risk2

Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem

Team fit5

How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes

Will he be there?

Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks

Comps0

Historical players this prospect resembles

Film & notes

Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports

Draftanomics's take

Draftanomics had Kennard Backman at #149 on draft night — a Day 3 grade — and GNB took him at No. 213, 64 picks later than our grade. Bust risk projects at 27%, near the position baseline.

Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 5, and it updates whenever the model does. See methodology for what drives the take.

Draftanomics Pick?
#149
Day 3range #92–#242 · volatile
Bust Probability?
27%
1.08× RB / WR / TE class avg (25%)
≈ class avg
Model trust: MODERATE
Actual NFL Pick?
#213
GNB · Rd 6
Year 1 Outcome?
1.3
20% snap share
Career outlook

Career outlook

How this is built →
5-year career arc

Too early to project a career arc.

No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.

Projected second contract
$5.1M($0M–$11.1M)/yr model
Role player / rotation contract
Bust risk
27%
realistic range 0–45%from a model with a graded track record at this position
Public-board consensus

No public-board coverage yet.

Pin a team in your account to see how this prospect fits your roster + cap.
Scout note
Private to this device — saved to your browser, never sent to a server.
Empty notes are auto-deleted.
Verdict
Model higher than NFL — outcome pending
Gap (actual − predicted)
+64

Film

Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.

Working in his favor: college production. Working against him: how many boards rank him top-100 and lowest board ranking.

College production
+0.03
Age
+0.02
Scout consensus
-0.02
Production trajectory
-0.01

Model read

Model grade
0.38 of 1
Confidence?
99%
Predicted round
5

The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.

Pulling the boards…
Mock-draft consensus
Pulling the mocks…
4-tier outlook?

Not enough to go on yet — no public board ranks him and there's no production or testing data to anchor a career projection.

Model market value
$5.1M
($0.0M – $11.1M)
rotational / depth
Model-predicted second-deal AAV ($M/yr).

Career trajectory + forecast

Solid points = actual NFL snap share per season. Dashed extension = forecast for upcoming years.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4
Actual Forecast (comp-based)
Risk dashboard

Elevated risk — watch the flags

Risk score29· WATCH

Everything that could go wrong with Kennard Backman, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.

  • Public-board coverage0 sources
    No public big board has ranked this prospect yet. The grade rests entirely on stats, measurables, and age — hold it loosely.
  • Predicted-pick range#92–242 · 150-pick spread
    The model's own projections scatter widely for this prospect — the landing spot is genuinely uncertain.
  • Bust probability27%
    Modest bust risk — normal territory for the position.
  • Age22.2 yrs
    Within the typical TE draft-age band (~23.5).

Case for / case against

Named, concrete signals — every flag cites numbers, comp players, or schedule context.

Reasons to fade
No athletic testing
medium
No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Below-cohort college production
medium
Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.45 — well below the skill average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Reasons to buy
No opportunity flags raised.
Scheme context
Loading…

Teams likely to draft

Based on each team's roster depth at RB / WR / TE, age, and recent capital invested.

CLV#1 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short6Recent picks spent hereLittle
HST#2 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short6Recent picks spent hereLittle
SL#3 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short6Recent picks spent hereLittle
BLT#4 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short6Recent picks spent hereLittle
ARZ#5 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short6Recent picks spent hereLittle
Scout reports
Paste in any scouting report you trust; Draftanomics pulls out the concrete claims so you can weigh them against the model on the same page.
Loading…