Haul grades · 2024

Post-draft letter grade for every team. Each grade composites four dimensions: value (pick-value efficiency vs the Chase Stuart chart), need (share of picks at roster-need positions), risk (higher = safer, less bust exposure), and model agreement (share of picks that matched Draftanomics's read at the time).

TAMA-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 29.6 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
66
MODEL
57
7 picks
INDB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 31.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
89
RISK
54
MODEL
44
9 picks
NYGB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 28.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
53
MODEL
33
6 picks
ARIB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 38.1 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
60
MODEL
0
12 picks
ATLB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 67.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
88
RISK
56
MODEL
13
8 picks
NWEB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 32.9 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
100
NEED
75
RISK
67
MODEL
38
8 picks
WASB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 37.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (78% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
78
RISK
54
MODEL
33
9 picks
JAXB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 23.0 spots of value against our board).
VALUE
96
NEED
67
RISK
52
MODEL
33
9 picks
CINC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.1 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (90% of picks).
VALUE
72
NEED
90
RISK
52
MODEL
10
10 picks
CARC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
68
NEED
100
RISK
51
MODEL
29
7 picks
LVRC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
46
NEED
100
RISK
65
MODEL
50
8 picks
HOUC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
59
NEED
89
RISK
40
MODEL
22
9 picks
TENC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
47
NEED
86
RISK
56
MODEL
14
7 picks
SEAC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks).
VALUE
45
NEED
75
RISK
55
MODEL
25
8 picks
PHIC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (78% of picks).
VALUE
43
NEED
78
RISK
61
MODEL
22
9 picks
SFOC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 8.5 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
33
NEED
100
RISK
48
MODEL
25
8 picks
LACC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 11.1 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
28
NEED
100
RISK
62
MODEL
33
9 picks
CHIC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 15.4 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks).
VALUE
19
NEED
80
RISK
64
MODEL
60
5 picks
BALD+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (78% of picks).
VALUE
40
NEED
78
RISK
56
MODEL
22
9 picks
BUFD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 14.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (90% of picks).
VALUE
22
NEED
90
RISK
57
MODEL
40
10 picks
DALD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 16.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
17
NEED
100
RISK
51
MODEL
25
8 picks
PITD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 20.1 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
10
NEED
86
RISK
66
MODEL
43
7 picks
CLED
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 12.2 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). High-risk class — multiple picks carrying coin-flip bust risk.
VALUE
26
NEED
100
RISK
34
MODEL
0
6 picks
DEND
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 18.4 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
13
NEED
100
RISK
55
MODEL
14
7 picks
KAND
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 18.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
13
NEED
100
RISK
70
MODEL
0
7 picks
GNBD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 19.5 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (73% of picks).
VALUE
11
NEED
73
RISK
49
MODEL
46
11 picks
NYJD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 21.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (71% of picks).
VALUE
7
NEED
71
RISK
64
MODEL
43
7 picks
NORD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 36.4 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
86
RISK
65
MODEL
43
7 picks
DETF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 47.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
83
RISK
70
MODEL
17
6 picks
LARF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 30.5 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
80
RISK
66
MODEL
30
10 picks
MIAF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 44.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
86
RISK
60
MODEL
29
7 picks
MINF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 31.7 spots above our board's price). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
67
RISK
65
MODEL
33
6 picks