Haul grades · 2022

Post-draft letter grade for every team. Each grade composites four dimensions: value (pick-value efficiency vs the Chase Stuart chart), need (share of picks at roster-need positions), risk (higher = safer, less bust exposure), and model agreement (share of picks that matched Draftanomics's read at the time).

MINA-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 28.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
47
MODEL
60
10 picks
DENB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 31.6 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
46
MODEL
33
9 picks
NORB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 44.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
63
MODEL
20
5 picks
HOUB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 17.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
84
NEED
100
RISK
54
MODEL
56
9 picks
NYGB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 17.6 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
85
NEED
100
RISK
65
MODEL
27
11 picks
INDB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 17.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
85
NEED
100
RISK
53
MODEL
38
8 picks
DALB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
73
NEED
100
RISK
65
MODEL
33
9 picks
SFOB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 24.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
98
NEED
89
RISK
45
MODEL
11
9 picks
PHIB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 23.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks).
VALUE
98
NEED
80
RISK
42
MODEL
20
5 picks
MIAB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 23.5 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks).
VALUE
97
NEED
75
RISK
36
MODEL
50
4 picks
CINB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.7 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
73
NEED
100
RISK
54
MODEL
33
6 picks
NYJB-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
69
NEED
100
RISK
71
MODEL
29
7 picks
BALC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (91% of picks).
VALUE
60
NEED
91
RISK
56
MODEL
27
11 picks
ATLC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
55
NEED
88
RISK
65
MODEL
38
8 picks
SEAC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (78% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
54
NEED
78
RISK
67
MODEL
56
9 picks
DETC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
49
NEED
100
RISK
56
MODEL
38
8 picks
WASC
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks).
VALUE
72
NEED
75
RISK
54
MODEL
13
8 picks
NWEC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (90% of picks).
VALUE
59
NEED
90
RISK
48
MODEL
30
10 picks
TAMC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
47
NEED
88
RISK
51
MODEL
38
8 picks
LVRC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
46
NEED
100
RISK
46
MODEL
17
6 picks
TENC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
45
NEED
89
RISK
48
MODEL
22
9 picks
BUFD+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
36
NEED
88
RISK
54
MODEL
13
8 picks
JAXD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 8.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (71% of picks).
VALUE
33
NEED
71
RISK
52
MODEL
29
7 picks
CLED+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 16.2 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
18
NEED
89
RISK
63
MODEL
22
9 picks
PITD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 16.9 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (71% of picks).
VALUE
16
NEED
71
RISK
56
MODEL
29
7 picks
LACD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 20.4 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
9
NEED
100
RISK
49
MODEL
13
8 picks
ARID
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 35.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
62
MODEL
25
8 picks
KAND
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 31.3 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
58
MODEL
30
10 picks
CARF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 26.0 spots above our board's price).
VALUE
0
NEED
50
RISK
59
MODEL
17
6 picks
CHIF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 28.7 spots above our board's price).
VALUE
0
NEED
64
RISK
58
MODEL
36
11 picks
GNBF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 26.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (73% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
73
RISK
59
MODEL
27
11 picks
LARF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 27.4 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). High-risk class — multiple picks carrying coin-flip bust risk.
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
27
MODEL
25
8 picks