Haul grades · 2020

Post-draft letter grade for every team. Each grade composites four dimensions: value (pick-value efficiency vs the Chase Stuart chart), need (share of picks at roster-need positions), risk (higher = safer, less bust exposure), and model agreement (share of picks that matched Draftanomics's read at the time).

DETA-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 26.1 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
42
MODEL
67
9 picks
SEAB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 43.9 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
61
MODEL
25
8 picks
SFOB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 20.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
90
NEED
100
RISK
71
MODEL
40
5 picks
TENB+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
69
NEED
100
RISK
74
MODEL
60
5 picks
LVRB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 22.9 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
96
NEED
100
RISK
51
MODEL
29
7 picks
HOUB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 41.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
46
MODEL
0
5 picks
NWEB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 48.1 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
89
RISK
53
MODEL
0
9 picks
LACB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 21.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
92
NEED
83
RISK
65
MODEL
17
6 picks
ATLB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 17.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks).
VALUE
84
NEED
83
RISK
49
MODEL
33
6 picks
CARB-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
69
NEED
100
RISK
57
MODEL
43
7 picks
BALC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
58
NEED
100
RISK
76
MODEL
20
10 picks
DENC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
55
NEED
100
RISK
74
MODEL
20
10 picks
JAXC
Value-neutral haul. Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
67
NEED
67
RISK
72
MODEL
17
12 picks
NYJC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (78% of picks).
VALUE
63
NEED
78
RISK
38
MODEL
33
9 picks
CHIC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (71% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
57
NEED
71
RISK
67
MODEL
29
7 picks
ARIC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
43
NEED
100
RISK
57
MODEL
33
6 picks
TAMC
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 7.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
35
NEED
100
RISK
62
MODEL
43
7 picks
CINC
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 8.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
33
NEED
86
RISK
84
MODEL
43
7 picks
MIAC-
Value-neutral haul.
VALUE
52
NEED
64
RISK
60
MODEL
36
11 picks
PITC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
44
NEED
100
RISK
52
MODEL
17
6 picks
INDC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 9.3 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
31
NEED
89
RISK
53
MODEL
33
9 picks
CLEC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 22.3 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
5
NEED
100
RISK
80
MODEL
43
7 picks
NYGC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 24.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
1
NEED
100
RISK
71
MODEL
60
10 picks
PHID+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks).
VALUE
39
NEED
80
RISK
49
MODEL
30
10 picks
DALD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 14.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
21
NEED
86
RISK
56
MODEL
29
7 picks
NORD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 15.5 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
19
NEED
75
RISK
72
MODEL
50
4 picks
KAND+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 30.8 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
68
MODEL
33
6 picks
WASD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 17.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
16
NEED
88
RISK
51
MODEL
25
8 picks
LARD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 18.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
14
NEED
89
RISK
55
MODEL
33
9 picks
MIND
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 26.9 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (93% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
93
RISK
59
MODEL
33
15 picks
GNBF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 15.7 spots above our board's price).
VALUE
19
NEED
67
RISK
49
MODEL
22
9 picks
BUFF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 36.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (71% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
71
RISK
59
MODEL
43
7 picks