Haul grades · 2019

Post-draft letter grade for every team. Each grade composites four dimensions: value (pick-value efficiency vs the Chase Stuart chart), need (share of picks at roster-need positions), risk (higher = safer, less bust exposure), and model agreement (share of picks that matched Draftanomics's read at the time).

NYJA-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 25.3 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
74
MODEL
33
6 picks
ATLB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 43.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
52
MODEL
29
7 picks
SFOB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 27.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
88
RISK
53
MODEL
38
8 picks
CARB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 43.9 spots of value against our board).
VALUE
100
NEED
57
RISK
49
MODEL
57
7 picks
PHIB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 30.2 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
80
RISK
57
MODEL
40
5 picks
SEAB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 23.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (82% of picks).
VALUE
97
NEED
82
RISK
63
MODEL
18
11 picks
HOUB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 18.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
87
NEED
100
RISK
48
MODEL
29
7 picks
DENB
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
67
NEED
100
RISK
76
MODEL
33
6 picks
JAXB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 43.3 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
86
RISK
50
MODEL
14
7 picks
DETB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 16.9 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
84
NEED
100
RISK
50
MODEL
22
9 picks
PITB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 13.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
78
NEED
100
RISK
66
MODEL
22
9 picks
TAMB-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.4 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
73
NEED
88
RISK
65
MODEL
25
8 picks
BALC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
74
NEED
88
RISK
68
MODEL
13
8 picks
OAKC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
51
NEED
100
RISK
59
MODEL
33
9 picks
DALC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). High-risk class — multiple picks carrying coin-flip bust risk.
VALUE
65
NEED
100
RISK
29
MODEL
25
8 picks
GNBC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
58
NEED
88
RISK
42
MODEL
25
8 picks
INDC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
51
NEED
100
RISK
57
MODEL
20
10 picks
NYGC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (90% of picks).
VALUE
40
NEED
90
RISK
61
MODEL
50
10 picks
TENC
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 15.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
20
NEED
100
RISK
91
MODEL
33
6 picks
CHIC-
Value-neutral haul. High-risk class — multiple picks carrying coin-flip bust risk.
VALUE
47
NEED
60
RISK
32
MODEL
80
5 picks
NWEC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (80% of picks).
VALUE
43
NEED
80
RISK
51
MODEL
30
10 picks
CINC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (90% of picks).
VALUE
39
NEED
90
RISK
42
MODEL
50
10 picks
WASC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (90% of picks).
VALUE
38
NEED
90
RISK
55
MODEL
20
10 picks
KANC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 11.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
27
NEED
100
RISK
60
MODEL
33
6 picks
BUFD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 24.1 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
2
NEED
100
RISK
61
MODEL
38
8 picks
ARID+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 41.5 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
61
MODEL
55
11 picks
LARD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 45.5 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
79
MODEL
25
8 picks
NORD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 17.2 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
16
NEED
100
RISK
44
MODEL
20
5 picks
LACF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 16.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks).
VALUE
17
NEED
86
RISK
60
MODEL
0
7 picks
CLEF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 30.4 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
86
RISK
70
MODEL
0
7 picks
MIAF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 32.5 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
51
MODEL
17
6 picks
MINF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 36.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (92% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
92
RISK
50
MODEL
17
12 picks