Haul grades · 2018

Post-draft letter grade for every team. Each grade composites four dimensions: value (pick-value efficiency vs the Chase Stuart chart), need (share of picks at roster-need positions), risk (higher = safer, less bust exposure), and model agreement (share of picks that matched Draftanomics's read at the time).

CHIA-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 29.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
73
MODEL
43
7 picks
DETA-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 22.5 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
95
NEED
100
RISK
70
MODEL
50
6 picks
ATLA-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 20.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
90
NEED
100
RISK
70
MODEL
50
6 picks
HOUB+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 18.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
88
NEED
100
RISK
61
MODEL
38
8 picks
CLEB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 41.3 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
100
NEED
100
RISK
57
MODEL
11
9 picks
MINB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 23.0 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks).
VALUE
96
NEED
88
RISK
57
MODEL
38
8 picks
CARB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 19.8 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
90
NEED
100
RISK
58
MODEL
13
8 picks
INDB
Solid value haul (picks averaged 17.6 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
85
NEED
100
RISK
63
MODEL
36
11 picks
SFOB
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
64
NEED
100
RISK
70
MODEL
44
9 picks
SEAC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 14.6 spots of value against our board).
VALUE
79
NEED
67
RISK
64
MODEL
33
9 picks
NWEC+
Solid value haul (picks averaged 10.1 spots of value against our board). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
70
NEED
89
RISK
46
MODEL
33
9 picks
BALC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (92% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
68
NEED
92
RISK
70
MODEL
17
12 picks
NYJC+
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks).
VALUE
56
NEED
83
RISK
60
MODEL
50
6 picks
NYGC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (83% of picks).
VALUE
49
NEED
83
RISK
62
MODEL
33
6 picks
KANC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
43
NEED
100
RISK
57
MODEL
33
6 picks
NORC
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
41
NEED
100
RISK
64
MODEL
14
7 picks
ARIC
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 8.2 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
34
NEED
100
RISK
63
MODEL
33
6 picks
JAXC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (71% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
64
NEED
71
RISK
69
MODEL
0
7 picks
CINC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (91% of picks).
VALUE
54
NEED
91
RISK
35
MODEL
18
11 picks
DENC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
47
NEED
100
RISK
49
MODEL
10
10 picks
BUFC-
Value-neutral haul. Filled positions of typical need (88% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
41
NEED
88
RISK
66
MODEL
25
8 picks
TENC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 8.2 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks).
VALUE
34
NEED
75
RISK
52
MODEL
50
4 picks
TAMC-
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 25.9 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
74
MODEL
63
8 picks
MIAD+
Value-neutral haul.
VALUE
48
NEED
63
RISK
58
MODEL
13
8 picks
OAKD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 9.7 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
31
NEED
89
RISK
55
MODEL
11
9 picks
PITD+
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 9.9 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (86% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
30
NEED
86
RISK
70
MODEL
14
7 picks
LACD
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 26.1 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
72
MODEL
14
7 picks
PHID
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 27.4 spots above our board's price). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
0
NEED
60
RISK
82
MODEL
60
5 picks
WASF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 22.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (75% of picks).
VALUE
5
NEED
75
RISK
61
MODEL
25
8 picks
GNBF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 24.6 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (73% of picks). Lower-risk profile across the class.
VALUE
1
NEED
73
RISK
66
MODEL
27
11 picks
DALF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 29.0 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (89% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
89
RISK
51
MODEL
33
9 picks
LARF
Reaches across the board (picks averaged 37.4 spots above our board's price). Filled positions of typical need (100% of picks).
VALUE
0
NEED
100
RISK
50
MODEL
0
11 picks