Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2021 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2021 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (TE)
PF
Pat Freiermuth
TE · Penn St.
22.5 yo · 6'5" · 251 lb
KP
Kyle Pitts
TE · Florida
20.6 yo · 6'5" · 245 lb
Tiebreaker
High confidence
Take Kyle Pitts over Pat Freiermuth.

Decisive factor: 31-pick gap on Draftanomics projection. Reinforced by $8M/yr more in projected second-deal AAV.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Pat Freiermuth
Predicted pick
#46
range #1–#91
Bust probability
0%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
#46
on 24 boards
Career arc
Contributor
tier · Day 2
2nd-deal AAV
$14Mmodel
Kyle Pitts
Predicted pick
#15
range #6–#24
Bust probability
0%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
#2
on 28 boards
Career arc
Starter
tier · 1st Round
2nd-deal AAV
$22Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Pat Freiermuth· RB / WR / TE
  • Kyle Pitts· RB / WR / TE
Axis leaders
  • ProductionPat Freiermuth0
  • AthleticismKyle Pitts57
  • AgePat Freiermuth64
  • ConsensusKyle Pitts100
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Pat Freiermuth50
  • Breakout agePat Freiermuth50
  • WorkloadPat Freiermuth100
  • RAS × productionPat Freiermuth0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • T.J. HockensonTE · Starter→ shared byPat FreiermuthKyle Pitts
  • Irv Smith Jr.TE · Contributor→ shared byPat FreiermuthKyle Pitts
  • Evan EngramTE · Bust→ shared byPat FreiermuthKyle Pitts
Pat Freiermuth
  • Kaden Smith
    TE · #176
    Contributor
  • Jordan Leggett
    TE · #150
    TBD
  • T.J. Hockensonshared
    TE · #8
    Starter
  • Irv Smith Jr.shared
    TE · #50
    Contributor
  • Evan Engramshared
    TE · #23
    Bust
Kyle Pitts
  • Noah Fant
    TE · #20
    Starter
  • T.J. Hockensonshared
    TE · #8
    Starter
  • Evan Engramshared
    TE · #23
    Bust
  • David Njoku
    TE · #29
    Bust
  • Irv Smith Jr.shared
    TE · #50
    Contributor

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Pat Freiermuth
Risks
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 4.03 (40th percentile at TE). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
  • Comp group has bust risk
    1 of 2 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Evan Engram. Mixed signal from history.
  • Below-cohort college production
    Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.08 — well below the skill average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Kyle Pitts
Risks
  • Comp group has bust risk
    2 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Evan Engram, David Njoku. Mixed signal from history.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Snap share
Pat FreiermuthKyle Pitts· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Pat Freiermuth

Draftanomics projects Pat Freiermuth (age 22.5 at draft) as a Day 2 pick at #46 (range #1-#91, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is mixed: 1 starters-or-better vs 1 backups-or-busts among the 2 comps with known outcomes. Closest comps: Kaden Smith (Contributor), Jordan Leggett, T.J. Hockenson (Starter). Ceiling is T.J. Hockenson (Starter); floor is Kaden Smith (Contributor). RAS 4.03 (40th percentile at TE). Athleticism is average at best for the position. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #46 sits within 3 spots of the room's #49 — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 0% bust probability break ties on draft day.

Kyle Pitts

Draftanomics projects Kyle Pitts (age 20.6 at draft) as a first-round pick at #15 (range #6-#24, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is mixed: 2 starters-or-better vs 2 backups-or-busts among the 4 comps with known outcomes. Closest comps: Noah Fant (Starter), T.J. Hockenson (Starter), Evan Engram (Bust). Ceiling is T.J. Hockenson (Starter); floor is Irv Smith Jr. (Contributor). 2 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Evan Engram, David Njoku. Mixed signal from history. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #15 sits within 12 spots of the room's #4 — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 0% bust probability break ties on draft day.