Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2020 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2020 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (DT)
RD
Raekwon Davis
DT · Alabama
22.9 yo · — · —
JE
Jordan Elliott
DT · Texas
22.4 yo · — · —
RL
Rashard Lawrence
DT · LSU
21.7 yo · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Raekwon Davis
Predicted pick
#56
range #8–#104
Bust probability
0%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
#95
on 24 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 2
2nd-deal AAV
$8Mmodel
Jordan Elliott
Predicted pick
#65
range #34–#96
Bust probability
0%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
#74
on 23 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 2
2nd-deal AAV
$6Mmodel
Rashard Lawrence
Predicted pick
#199
range #159–#239
Bust probability
45%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
#73
on 2 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Raekwon Davis· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Jordan Elliott· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Rashard Lawrence· EDGE / DL / LB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionRaekwon Davis0
  • AthleticismRaekwon Davis29
  • AgeJordan Elliott82
  • ConsensusRashard Lawrence8
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Raekwon Davis50
  • Breakout ageRaekwon Davis50
  • WorkloadRaekwon Davis100
  • RAS × productionRaekwon Davis0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Elijah QuallsDT · Bust→ shared byRaekwon DavisJordan ElliottRashard Lawrence
  • Caleb BrantleyDT · Bust→ shared byRaekwon DavisJordan ElliottRashard Lawrence
  • Montravius AdamsDT · Bust→ shared byRaekwon DavisJordan ElliottRashard Lawrence
  • Dalvin TomlinsonDT · Bust→ shared byRaekwon DavisRashard Lawrence
  • Sheldon DayDT · Starter→ shared byJordan ElliottRashard Lawrence
Raekwon Davis
  • Elijah Quallsshared
    DT · #214
    Bust
  • Dalvin Tomlinsonshared
    DT · #55
    Bust
  • Caleb Brantleyshared
    DT · #185
    Bust
  • Joshua Frazier
    DT · #246
    TBD
  • Montravius Adamsshared
    DT · #93
    Bust
Jordan Elliott
  • Caleb Brantleyshared
    DT · #185
    Bust
  • Montravius Adamsshared
    DT · #93
    Bust
  • Sheldon Dayshared
    DT · #103
    Starter
  • Kentavius Street
    DT · #128
    Contributor
  • Elijah Quallsshared
    DT · #214
    Bust
Rashard Lawrence
  • Elijah Quallsshared
    DT · #214
    Bust
  • Montravius Adamsshared
    DT · #93
    Bust
  • Sheldon Dayshared
    DT · #103
    Starter
  • Caleb Brantleyshared
    DT · #185
    Bust
  • Dalvin Tomlinsonshared
    DT · #55
    Bust

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Raekwon Davis
Risks
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 4.65 (46th percentile at DT). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
  • Comp group bust rate
    4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Elijah Qualls, Dalvin Tomlinson, Caleb Brantley (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
  • Below-cohort college production
    Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.38 — well below the front7 average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Jordan Elliott
Risks
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 4.28 (42th percentile at DT). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
  • Comp group bust rate
    3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Caleb Brantley, Montravius Adams, Elijah Qualls. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Rashard Lawrence
Risks
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 4.52 (45th percentile at DT). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
  • Comp group bust rate
    4 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Elijah Qualls, Montravius Adams, Caleb Brantley (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
  • Below-cohort college production
    Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.05 — well below the front7 average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    3 boards have him at mean rank #93; model has him #199 — a 106-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Snap share
Raekwon DavisJordan ElliottRashard Lawrence· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Raekwon Davis

Draftanomics projects Raekwon Davis (age 22.9 at draft) as a Day 2 pick at #56 (range #8-#104, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is dangerous: 4 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Elijah Qualls (Bust), Dalvin Tomlinson (Bust), Caleb Brantley (Bust). Ceiling is Joshua Frazier; floor is Elijah Qualls (Bust). 4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Elijah Qualls, Dalvin Tomlinson, Caleb Brantley (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a value lean: #56 against a consensus #81 is a 25-spot edge — enough to move him up the queue, not enough to reach a round early, with average-to-below athletic profile the tax on that edge.

Jordan Elliott

Draftanomics projects Jordan Elliott (age 22.4 at draft) as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #65 (range #34-#96, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is dangerous: 3 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Caleb Brantley (Bust), Montravius Adams (Bust), Sheldon Day (Starter). Ceiling is Sheldon Day (Starter); floor is Kentavius Street (Contributor). 3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Caleb Brantley, Montravius Adams, Elijah Qualls. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #65 sits within 6 spots of the room's #71 — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 0% bust probability break ties on draft day.

Rashard Lawrence

Draftanomics projects Rashard Lawrence (age 21.7 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #199 (range #159-#239, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 45% — real but not disqualifying. The comp set is dangerous: 4 of 5 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Elijah Qualls (Bust), Montravius Adams (Bust), Sheldon Day (Starter). Ceiling is Sheldon Day (Starter); floor is Elijah Qualls (Bust). 4 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Elijah Qualls, Montravius Adams, Caleb Brantley (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #93 and the model won't take him before #199 — a 106-spot markdown. The discount is earned — average-to-below athletic profile leads the case against.