Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2020 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2020 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (DT)
BJ
Broderick Washington Jr.
DT · Texas Tech
23.4 yo · — · —
JP
John Penisini
DT · Utah
22.9 yo · — · —
Tiebreaker
Low confidence — essentially tied
Truly tied on the model.

Broderick Washington Jr. and John Penisini project within 8 picks of each other, and neither bust risk nor the historical comps can separate them. Take the one at the position of greater need.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Broderick Washington Jr.
Predicted pick
#225
range #190–#260
Bust probability
10%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Starter
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$6Mmodel
John Penisini
Predicted pick
#183
range #167–#199
Bust probability
10%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Broderick Washington Jr.· EDGE / DL / LB
  • John Penisini· EDGE / DL / LB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionBroderick Washington Jr.0
  • AthleticismBroderick Washington Jr.29
  • AgeJohn Penisini21
  • ConsensusJohn Penisini5
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Broderick Washington Jr.50
  • Breakout ageBroderick Washington Jr.50
  • WorkloadBroderick Washington Jr.100
  • RAS × productionBroderick Washington Jr.0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Broderick Washington Jr.
  • Sebastian Joseph-Day
    DT · #195
    Starter
  • Jullian Taylor
    DT · #223
    Bust
  • B.J. Hill
    DT · #69
    Starter
  • Quinton Jefferson
    DT · #147
    Starter
  • Grover Stewart
    DT · #144
    Bust
John Penisini
  • Ryan Glasgow
    DT · #138
    Bust
  • Vincent Valentine
    DT · #96
    Bust
  • David Parry
    DT · #151
    Franchise
  • Nazair Jones
    DT · #102
    Bust
  • Carl Davis
    DT · #90
    Starter

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Broderick Washington Jr.
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.4 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 4.34 (43th percentile at DT). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
  • Comp group has bust risk
    2 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Jullian Taylor, Grover Stewart. Mixed signal from history.
Opportunities
  • Promising comp group
    3 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes hit Starter-or-better: Sebastian Joseph-Day, B.J. Hill, Quinton Jefferson.
John Penisini
Risks
  • Athletic profile below NFL threshold
    RAS 2.37 (23th percentile vs DT prospects in a 312-yr Combine population). Below the 30th-percentile bar that most NFL starters clear.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #215; model has him #183 — a 32-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
  • Comp group bust rate
    3 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Ryan Glasgow, Vincent Valentine, Nazair Jones. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Snap share
Broderick Washington Jr.John Penisini· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Broderick Washington Jr.

Draftanomics projects Broderick Washington Jr. (age 23.4 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #225 (range #190-#260, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 10% — low. The comp set is strong: 3 of 5 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Sebastian Joseph-Day (Starter), Jullian Taylor (Bust), B.J. Hill (Starter). Ceiling is B.J. Hill (Starter); floor is Sebastian Joseph-Day (Starter). Age 23.4 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed. The call is a hold: no public board ranks him, so the model's #225 stands alone — and with bust risk at 10%, let the room catch up before paying a premium.

John Penisini

Draftanomics projects John Penisini (age 22.9 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #183 (range #167-#199, wide band). Bust probability sits at 10% — low. The comp set is dangerous: 3 of 5 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Ryan Glasgow (Bust), Vincent Valentine (Bust), David Parry (Franchise). Ceiling is David Parry (Franchise); floor is Carl Davis (Starter). RAS 2.37 (23th percentile vs DT prospects in a 312-yr Combine population). Below the 30th-percentile bar that most NFL starters clear. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 32 spots ahead of the room (board #183 vs consensus #215), and at a 10% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.