Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2019 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2019 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (OT, C)
KM
Kaleb McGary
OT · Washington
— · 6'7" · 317 lb
EM
Erik McCoy
C · Texas A&M
— · — · —
Tiebreaker
High confidence
Take Erik McCoy over Kaleb McGary.

Decisive factor: 35-pick gap on Draftanomics projection.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Kaleb McGary
Predicted pick
#39
range #10–#68
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
Consensus rank
#68
on 24 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$16Mmodel
Erik McCoy
Predicted pick
#4
range #1–#57
Bust probability
0%
Consensus rank
#40
on 25 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$17Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Kaleb McGary· Offensive line
  • Erik McCoy· Offensive line
Axis leaders
  • ProductionKaleb McGary50
  • AthleticismKaleb McGary31
  • AgeKaleb McGary72
  • ConsensusErik McCoy42
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Kaleb McGary50
  • Breakout ageKaleb McGary50
  • WorkloadKaleb McGary50
  • RAS × productionKaleb McGary80

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Kaleb McGary
  • Jerald Hawkins
    OT · #123
    TBD
  • Shon Coleman
    OT · #76
    TBD
  • Taylor Decker
    OT · #16
    TBD
  • Garett Bolles
    OT · #20
    TBD
  • Jack Conklin
    OT · #8
    TBD
Erik McCoy
  • Pat Elflein
    C · #70
    TBD
  • Ryan Kelly
    C · #18
    TBD
  • Graham Glasgow
    C · #95
    TBD
  • Austin Blythe
    C · #248
    TBD
  • Ethan Pocic
    C · #58
    TBD

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Kaleb McGary
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    26 boards place him at mean rank #69; model has him #39 — a 30-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Erik McCoy
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    27 boards place him at mean rank #43; model has him #4 — a 39-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Snap share
Kaleb McGaryErik McCoy· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Kaleb McGary

Draftanomics projects Kaleb McGary as a Day 2 pick at #39 (range #10-#68, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set leans young — most of his closest comps haven't played enough NFL snaps yet to be confidently graded. Closest comps: Jerald Hawkins, Shon Coleman, Taylor Decker. Ceiling is Jack Conklin; floor is Jerald Hawkins. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 30 spots ahead of the room (board #39 vs consensus #69), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Erik McCoy

Draftanomics projects Erik McCoy as a top-10 pick at #4 (range #1-#57, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set leans young — most of his closest comps haven't played enough NFL snaps yet to be confidently graded. Closest comps: Pat Elflein, Ryan Kelly, Graham Glasgow. Ceiling is Ryan Kelly; floor is Austin Blythe. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 39 spots ahead of the room (board #4 vs consensus #43), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.