Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2016 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2016 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (OT)
CT
Cole Toner
OT · Harvard
— · 6'5" · 306 lb
JH
Joe Haeg
OT · North Dakota St.
— · — · —
WB
Willie Beavers
OT · Western Michigan
— · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Cole Toner
Predicted pick
#81
range #64–#98
Bust probability· rough estimate
12%
Consensus rank
#117
on 1 board
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel
Joe Haeg
Predicted pick
#71
range #50–#92
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
Consensus rank
#122
on 2 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel
Willie Beavers
Predicted pick
#135
range #125–#145
Bust probability· rough estimate
40%
Consensus rank
#115
on 2 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$6Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Cole Toner· Offensive line
  • Joe Haeg· Offensive line
  • Willie Beavers· Offensive line
Axis leaders
  • ProductionCole Toner50
  • AthleticismJoe Haeg43
  • AgeJoe Haeg100
  • ConsensusCole Toner21
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Cole Toner50
  • Breakout ageCole Toner50
  • WorkloadCole Toner50
  • RAS × productionCole Toner35

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Cole Toner
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Joe Haeg
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Willie Beavers
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Cole Toner
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    2 boards place him at mean rank #186; model has him #81 — a 104-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Joe Haeg
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    3 boards place him at mean rank #127; model has him #71 — a 56-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Willie Beavers
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Cole TonerJoe HaegWillie Beavers· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Cole Toner

Draftanomics projects Cole Toner as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #81 (range #64-#98, wide band). Bust probability sits at 12% — low. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 104 spots ahead of the room (board #81 vs consensus #186), and at a 12% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Joe Haeg

Draftanomics projects Joe Haeg as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #71 (range #50-#92, wide band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 56 spots ahead of the room (board #71 vs consensus #127), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Willie Beavers

Draftanomics projects Willie Beavers as a mid-round flyer at #135 (range #125-#145, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 40% — real but not disqualifying. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a lean fade: the model sits 25 spots below the room's consensus #110 — don't pay sticker price. The 25-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.